Change for summary judgments defeated

By: Sylvia Hsieh April 24, 2009

A controversial proposed change to summary judgment practice under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure has been voted down by a subcommittee. The proposal, known as "point-counterpoint," would have required a separate enumerated statement of undisputed facts with citations to the record for each fact. Many members of the plaintiffs' bar, especially employment attorneys, ...

Enter your user name and password in the fields above to gain access to the subscriber content on this site. Need a subscription? Click here.
Your subscription includes one set of login credentials for your exclusive use. Security features have been integrated on this site: If someone signs in with your credentials while you are logged in, the site will automatically close your ongoing login and you will lose access at that time.
If you feel your login credentials are being used by a second party, contact customer service at 877-615-9536 for assistance in changing your password.

Already a paid subscriber but not registered for online access yet? For instructions on how to get premium web access, click here.

Forgot your password?

MLM Counties News. Notices. Need-to-know Information.

Change for summary judgments defeated

Leave a Reply