Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Home / Law / Specific terms not required in MUFTA conspiracy claim

Specific terms not required in MUFTA conspiracy claim

A creditor need not specifically use the terms "piercing the corporate veil" or "alter ego" when bringing a conspiracy claim under the Missouri Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, the Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, determined on Tuesday. The decision comes after a St. Louis County trial court, acknowledging that an orthopedic surgeon went to "great ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*